EEngiGrind
← All problems
MechanicalMechanics of MaterialsmediumFE ExamCourseworkInterview

Cantilever Tip Deflection

A steel cantilever beam of length L=2.0 mL = 2.0\ \text{m} is rigidly built in at one end and carries a concentrated load P=5 kNP = 5\ \text{kN} at its free tip.

The beam has Young's modulus E=200 GPaE = 200\ \text{GPa} and second moment of area I=8.3×106 mm4I = 8.3 \times 10^{6}\ \text{mm}^4.

Find the vertical deflection at the free tip.

Given
P5 kNTip load
L2 mCantilever length
E200 GPaYoung's modulus
I8300000 mm^4Second moment of area
Hint 1

This is a standard beam case — identify which one before doing any arithmetic. Is the load distributed or concentrated? Where is it applied?

Hint 2

The formula is δ = PL³/(3EI). The hard part is not the formula.

Hint 3

Watch the conversion on I: mm⁴ to m⁴ is a factor of 10⁻¹², because length is raised to the fourth power.

Worked solution — try the problem first

For a cantilever with a point load at the free end, the standard result is

δ=PL33EI\delta = \frac{PL^3}{3EI}

Convert everything to base SI before substituting — this is where most of the marks are lost.

P=5 kN=5000 NP = 5\ \text{kN} = 5000\ \text{N} E=200 GPa=200×109 PaE = 200\ \text{GPa} = 200 \times 10^{9}\ \text{Pa} I=8.3×106 mm4=8.3×106×(103)4=8.3×106 m4I = 8.3\times10^{6}\ \text{mm}^4 = 8.3\times10^{6} \times (10^{-3})^4 = 8.3\times10^{-6}\ \text{m}^4

Note the conversion factor on II is 101210^{-12}, not 10310^{-3} — it is a fourth power of length.

Numerator: PL3=5000×(2.0)3=5000×8=4.0×104 N⋅m3PL^3 = 5000 \times (2.0)^3 = 5000 \times 8 = 4.0\times10^{4}\ \text{N·m}^3

Denominator: 3EI=3×200×109×8.3×106=3×1.66×106=4.98×106 N⋅m23EI = 3 \times 200\times10^{9} \times 8.3\times10^{-6} = 3 \times 1.66\times10^{6} = 4.98\times10^{6}\ \text{N·m}^2

δ=4.0×1044.98×106=8.03×103 m\delta = \frac{4.0\times10^{4}}{4.98\times10^{6}} = 8.03\times10^{-3}\ \text{m}

δ=8.03 mm downward\boxed{\delta = 8.03\ \text{mm downward}}

Sanity check: span/250 is a common deflection limit; 2000/250=8 mm2000/250 = 8\ \text{mm}. This beam sits right at that limit, which is a plausible design point rather than an absurd answer.

Concepts:Beam deflectionCantilever bendingUnit consistencySecond moment of area

Sign in to submit

Grading needs an account so your progress, attempts, and daily quota can be tracked. The problem statement and worked solution stay open to everyone.

Create an account